So I came across this on LinkedIn and I really liked the concept that Franky Plata Rojas and Thibauly Kervarech have going here. Definitely worth checking out if you’re look for something new to read.

weareteachers:

Love this chart of wonderful words. 
http://www.pinterest.com/pin/2251868538785458/

weareteachers:

Love this chart of wonderful words. 

http://www.pinterest.com/pin/2251868538785458/

(Source: pussreboots)

fuckyeahfanficflamingo:

[NOTHING TO DO? WRITER’S BLOCK. (Fanfic Flamingo) SEVERAL THINGS TO DO?  PLOTBUNNYSPLOSION.]

fuckyeahfanficflamingo:

[NOTHING TO DO? WRITER’S BLOCK. (Fanfic Flamingo) SEVERAL THINGS TO DO?  PLOTBUNNYSPLOSION.]

"

My rule? When in doubt, Vonnegut.

1. Use the time of a total stranger in such a way that he or she will not feel the time was wasted.
2. Give the reader at least one character he or she can root for.
3. Every character should want something, even if it is only a glass of water.
4. Every sentence must do one of two things—reveal character or advance the action.
5. Start as close to the end as possible.
6. Be a sadist. No matter how sweet and innocent your leading characters, make awful things happen to them—in order that the reader may see what they are made of.
7. Write to please just one person. If you open a window and make love to the world, so to speak, your story will get pneumonia.
8. Give your readers as much information as possible as soon as possible. To heck with suspense. Readers should have such complete understanding of what is going on, where and why, that they could finish the story themselves, should cockroaches eat the last few pages.

Like any list of rules, should you break them but be so astoundingly amazing in your defiance, then the rules are meaningless.

Very few writers are astoundingly amazing in their defiance.

"

http://thechristaland.tumblr.com/post/54965895251/why-the-books-you-recommend-are-probably-stupid (via bookishbiologist)

(Source: literaticat, via pileofmonkeys)

blackaudacity:

image

Jenna Wortham

As  a technology reporter for The New York Times, Jenna Wortham writes about mobile apps, Web start-ups, and everything in between. Prior to theTimes, Wortham served as a technology and culture reporter for Wired.com. In-depth and comprehensible to even the most technologically-impaired, her writing has also appeared in print publications like WiredBust, and Frommer’s. Yet her most distinctive work to date is Girl Crush, a zine launched by Wortham and Thessaly La Force that venerates inspirational women. Girl Crush’s first volume, released last summer, featured over 20 essays and musings from acclaimed female contributors, including a Pulitzer-winning novelist. “The goal isn’t to turn a profit, but rather to capture a cultural moment, which in turn, offers the creators the freedom to explore and experiment,” explained Wortham in a Times article on zines.

image

Rembert Browne

Like many of his twenty-something year-old peers, Rembert Browne started a blog, 500 Days Asunderin 2011 to document his daily musings and to put his “creative juices” to practice. His exhilarating honesty coupled with his tangy wit and introspective rumination made for some of the best, most unique blog posts published in a while. Included in his most popular posts are “5 Black Comedians: A Study,” “Top 10 Diddy Moments. Ever,” and “Me vs. Drake.”  While most people, young or old, might have balled up into a dark, deep hole after being fired from their first job within nine months, or withdrawing from graduate school with eight months left, Browne wrote a kick ass, inspirational farewell blog post titled “About That Life” before reassessing his next moves. The Dartmouth alum was soon after promoted from freelancer to staff writer atGrantland, where he puts his distinct spin on culture and sports.

image

Jackie Sibblies Drury

Since entering the selective stratosphere that is American theatre, the Brooklyn-based playwright Jackie Sibblies Drury’s star has continued soaring to impressive heights. A 2012 New York Magazine article spotlighted her as one of the city’s 10 playwrights to watch. Time spent at Brown University’s MFA playwriting program resulted in her winning the David Wickham Prize in Playwriting and a Weston Award. Drury went on to write the award-winning playWe Are Proud to Present a Presentation and receive multiple fellowships, including the inaugural Jerome New York Fellowship, which awarded her $50,000 towards producing new work and researching Morocco. In an interview with “Works By Women” last fall, Drury explained the project: “I’m hoping to spend my time talking with people, observing people, and reading a lot while thinking about the intersections between politics, Islam, and feminism, both in a predominantly Islamic state as well as in African-American communities in the U.S.”

image

Uzoamaka Maduka

Otherwise known as Max, Uzoamaka Maduka’s name has been plastered all over major New York City publications. More attention has been given to her socialite-like charisma than her literary journal, The American Reader. Nonetheless, the Nigerian-American Princeton graduate has been on a steadfast mission to revitalize the American literary magazine. “So many of the voices in fiction that are out there are deeply neurotic white male stories…I kind of felt like, I really don’t want to sit still for this,” Maduka told The New York Times. “Literature, from women of any race and men of any race, besides white, would always be pigeonholed as, ‘Now I’m going to tell you my Nigerian story,’ and it was so tiring.” Two issues of The American Reader were published in 2012 to mostly tentative reviews, but Maduka has already shifted her focus to this calendar year with aims of landing a second investor and scouting potential writers.

image

Kyla Marshell

The petite, powerhouse poet that is

Kyla Marshell has been building a solid repertoire of award-winning published pieces for quite some time now. She has demonstrated an acute ability to dissect multifaceted issues, both social and personal, in her arsenal of poems. In “We’ll Always Have Negritude,” a piece about “how Black people are going to survive the apocalypse,” Marshell writes, “my locs will be the chain-link fence keeping out those aliens, & your afro will be the cumulus clouds cottoning the sky, the unpicked cotton sky.” A graduate of Spelman College and Sarah Lawrence College, she has also penned excellent commentary on Black hipsters and the hashtag’s lament, written reviews on jazz for Okayplayer’s The Revivalist, and received a Jacob K. Javits Fellowship in 2011 and a Cave Canem Fellowship in 2010 and 2011.

image

Jason Parham

“We as a people come out of this highly literary Black tradition where we’re trying to break down societal barriers through art and give a voice to people who often go unheard,” Jason Parham, editor of the literary journal Spook, told EBONY.com in a past interview. “We create our own conversations and dictate our own conversations and show we are just as powerful and we have just as much to say as anybody else.” Having noticed a dearth in the canon of great journals like The New Yorker and Harpers, Parham displayed an exemplary amount of self-determination and created a great publication “with a heavy minority focus.” Sixteen Black writers (including Marshell and Browne) skilled in various genres contributed to the first issue of Spook released this past June. Parham, who has penned articles for VibeGQThe Atlantic and Village Voice, told our Brooke Obie that he was transitioning to creative writing, working on his novel, and finalizing the second volume of Spook. “With Spook, I hope to show that our writing is as good as anybody else’s.”

image

Taiye Selasi

When Toni Morrison sets a deadline for you, you meet it. And that is exactly what Taiye Selasi did, according to an NPR interview. After meeting Morrison through the author’s niece, Selasi ended up having dinner at Morrison’s home and then her son’s home. It was during that second meeting that the Pulitzer Prize winner gave Selasi an ultimatum. “She said, ‘Listen, I’m going to give you a year. If you don’t have something for me by then, I don’t know what to say.” A year later, Selasi produced the short story, “The Sex Lives of African Girls,” which was published in the heralded literary journal Granta in 2011 and featured in Best American Short Stories of 2012. Born in London and raised in Massachusetts, Selasi unpacked intricate notions of identity in her 2005 seminal essay titled, “Bye-Bye, Babar (Or: What is an Afropolitan?”) Ghana Must Go, her highly-anticipated debut novel, will be released in March.


Read more at EBONY http://www.ebony.com/entertainment-culture/7-young-black-writers-you-should-know-304/2#ixzz2J6AeX9Iy 

(via slaybelle)

racebending:

princelesscomic:

princelesscomic:

J. Skylar at Comic Book Bin wrote an incredible article that can be used AS A STARTING POINT when writing LGBT characters or about LGBT issues.  Follow the link, check it out, but remember: your most important job when you write about another culture of any type is to do your research and understand what the words you are using mean, not just from a dictionary but to those who will read them and be affected.

Writing about topics you are not directly involved in can be a difficult task, particularly when it concerns cultural identities because you may inadvertently offend the very people you wish to write about. This is especially true when writing about the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) community, because its terminology has changed and evolved considerably over the past century.”

So…apparently this is somehow up for debate.  Read the site editor’s response.  Please, let him know what you think…I did.  http://www.comicbookbin.com/Challenging_LGBT_Classifications001.html

Skylar’s tips for writers included simple things like avoiding the word “homosexual” and using “transgender” as an adjective instead of a noun. Apparently this was too much for site editor Herve St-Louis, who writes:

However, Skyler’s construct seemed to me too normative and too controlling. If you’ve read ComicBookBin for ten years or know about me personally, you’ll know that I like to poke fun at authority figures and normative stances. I can’t help it. I like to challenge dogma. Skyler introduced her classification method to writers of ComicBookBin because presumably she was annoyed at how we wrote and classified LGBT issues. I am the first one to admit to using the word homosexual to describe gay men in several articles. Before reading Skyler’s notes, I had no clue whatsoever that the word homosexual was even a problem. In fact, I always assumed that the term “gay” was more associated with a specific lifestyle that trapped many men into a specific cultural identity and that the word homosexual freed them of being classified under a cultural construct.

…I feel that Skyler’s classification unduly restricts the voice of other writers. Because it is motivated by a need to reverse a dominant discourse, it therefore manifests an objective that may not be shared with other writers at ComicBookBin. At ComicBookBin, we have had writers who were on the extreme left and some who definitely were right of centre. I welcome all of them. Personally, I find the rainbow of terms defined by LGBT too cumbersome and too elastic in its attempt to include everyone and make everybody happy. I will admit that I find placing lesbians before gays a trivial matter. It feels like overbearing political correctness and I don’t like it. ComicBookBin is not about political correctness. It’s about comics. That writers choose to classify terms as suggested by Skyler is something I will leave to each of them to decide. I will not adopt the full range of Skyler’s classification because it’s too heavy to use for me. Also, I am not convinced that terms such as “homosexual” are deemed as derogatory by many gays. It sounds as something that queer theorists debate among each other as opposed to a feeling shared by the gay population at large about the term homosexual being insulting to them. Skyler’s classification has certainly educated me, but I can choose my own classification construct just as Skyler does.

…One of my biggest criticisms of Skyler’s article is that it talks down on people instead of including them in the discourse. We have a lecturer lecturing readers about what is acceptable language and what is not. The rebel in me right away flared up with what I deem a patronizing language. Skyler’s classification did not include groups which were not part of the LGBT in the discussion. In a weird way they were excluded from the discourse and became the other which Skyler has tried to deflate.

…an individual helpfully lays out general guidelines for how to reflect or write about a marginalized community. The suggestions are rejected for bring too “heavy” or otherwise cumbersome—in other words, the writer’s convenience is prioritized over the needs of the marginalized community the writer is trying to represent. The tips for how to write sensitively are deemed “patronizing” and exclusionary towards straight people.

(via initiumseries)